About

The American Speech-Language-Hearing Foundation (ASHFoundation) invites doctoral students to compete for the Student Research Grant in Audiology, supported by the Ira M. Ventry and Brad Friedrich Memorial Funds.

This grant memorializes two individuals. Ira Ventry was an audiologist whose research interests and publications focused on suprathreshold hearing, conductive hearing loss, hearing screening in the elderly, and hearing handicap assessment. Brad Friedrich lectured and published widely in the field of pediatric audiology and was known for his ability to diagnose difficult-to-test children.

In 2025, up to three grants of $2,000 each will be awarded.

Eligibility

Students must meet the following requirements to be eligible for the Student Research Grant in Audiology.

  1. Students must be doctoral (research or clinical) degree students enrolled in, or accepted for, study in audiology or hearing science at an academic program in the United States.
  1. Students must be enrolled for full-time study for the full academic year.
  1. Candidates pursuing an entry level clinical doctorate in audiology must be in a program accredited by, or in candidacy status from, the Council on Academic Accreditation in Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
  1. Proposals must be for research to be initiated in clinical and/or rehabilitative audiology.

Evaluation Criteria

A review panel will evaluate proposals based on the following three factors.

Factor 1: Importance of the Research (Scored 1-9)

  1. Significance:The potential for the study to advance the discipline of communication sciences and disorders and to impact clinical needs relevant to audiology. Consideration of the rationale for undertaking the study, the rigor of the scientific background for the work (e.g., prior literature and/or preliminary data) and whether the scientific background justifies the proposed study.
  2. Innovation: The refinement, improvement, or new application of theoretical concepts, methods, or interventions leading to high impact on the discipline.

Factor 2: Rigor and Feasibility (Scored 1-9)

  1. Approach: The likelihood that compelling, reproducible findings will result (rigor) and whether the proposed study can be done well and within the timeframe proposed (feasibility). The merits of the design for accomplishing the specific aims of the study. The appropriateness and feasibility of a detailed account of the method, including measurement and data-analysis plans, will be considered.

Factor 3: Expertise and Resources (Scored 1-9)

  1. Investigator: The perceived ability to carry out the study in one year, reflected by appropriate training, experience, and past accomplishments. The student investigator outlines clear and detailed management and budget plans.
  2. Environment: The extent to which the student has access to needed scientific facilities, resources, personnel, and participants.

Reviewers will assign scores on a 1–9 scale for each of the three factors. They will also consider these factors to assign an Overall Impact score, reflecting their assessment of the study’s potential to exert a sustained, powerful influence on the research field(s) involved. A proposal does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have a major scientific impact.

The Overall Impact score reflects reviewers’ assessment of whether a proposed study will be completed competently, be disseminated appropriately, yield a substantial research program, and has the potential to impact the discipline.

The three factors contribute differentially to the Overall Impact score to correspond to the goals and funding level of the grant competition. For the Student Research Grant in Audiology, Factor 2 (Rigor and Feasibility) is more heavily weighted because a tightly designed, feasible study is most appropriate.

The student investigator will be evaluated in comparison to other student investigators in the discipline, focusing on their ability to clearly outline the activities and timeline to complete the study within one year.

Proposal Guidelines

Proposal text should be single-spaced and placed in ONE PDF document containing all required sections in the order indicated. Please use the stated titles (below) as section headers and include page numbers. Any page(s) exceeding the length limitation will not be considered by the review panel. Selected font should be 12 point and uncondensed, and margins should be at least 1 inch.

  1. Biographical Sketch (limit 1 page)
    Provide a brief biographical sketch that includes, at minimum, professional interests, research experience and publications/papers.

  1. Abstract (limit 1 page)
    Describe the study's specific aims, methodology and long-term objectives, referring to the scientific disciplines involved. Relate the study to clinical practice and its potential impact on clinical or rehabilitative audiology.

  1. Research Plan (limit 10 pages)

    1. Specific Aims: Present the problem or issue to be addressed and the specific research question you will investigate.

    2. Significance of Research: Outline the significance of the existing need and the importance of the proposed study in understanding, remediating, or compensating for the problem.

    3. Design Methods, Procedures, and Evaluation: Provide both a description and a justification for the study design, including participants, measurement techniques, instrumentation, data analysis, and evaluation procedures. Address ecological validity if the type of research warrants this. Address potential challenges that could impact completion of the study. This section should provide enough detail for reviewers to make informed judgments about the soundness of the proposed research procedures.

    4. Facilities and Resources: Describe the facilities, resources, and participants available to you for carrying out the proposed study.

  1. Management Plan and Budget (limit 2 pages)
    Outline study activities with timelines and justify budget items. The study start date will be December 1, 2025. Incorporate the ASHFoundation final report deadline (see above Required Report section) into the timeline. Indirect costs and travel expenses for meetings, or for the ASHA Convention, to present research results may not be included in the budget.

  1. Human Subjects (limit 3 pages)
    Submit evidence that the proposal meets the requirements for adequate protection of participants by including a statement of support from your Institutional Review Board. Also acceptable is a statement outlining the elements of the design and procedures that follow accepted practices and are recognized as providing adequate protection for participants. This statement should be signed by the student and mentor.

  1. Bibliography (limit 2 pages)

  1. Letter of Support
    Submit a letter from your academic adviser and/or research mentor indicating that the proposed study will not present a conflict of interest with your current responsibilities and commitments. This letter of support also should comment on the merits of the proposed study.